… I might notice this neighbor „squirrel“ modelling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hzAUQI-Fe0
for an entertainment cookie? This is given from me as example and for orientation.
But, hey I have not said it were not an ordinary totalitarian parole of culture industry neither, such as glorifying its sporty survival conditions, to say, its crimes as healthy. Do not know how much of that poison gonna be mortal, to perceive the idea through the mirror of culture industry like this, rare sensation, not? (; I prefer that wares from culture industry can be used for project labeling. Yes. You do not believe me? This is debian style with toy story, right? Labeling: a schematic part of communication effort. Yes, we will use the imagery of that stuff, schematics, for our code, free code. We could for example label the list of future releases by figures in nut job. This could be hated, because of being:robust! I have to study the topic any nearer. What is culture industry wanting currently? What is culture industry consisting of, in our case? Triggered here from this presumed mislead: I am still speaking about this piece of culture industry ware, right?
…gonna swap to new post, I know, so bye for now ..
Hey, what is this but the naming scheme proposal:

I would further swindle, that the squirrel in the middle, the blue one right hand to the orange one, is the central, the current figure: This version can be called Sir. Then we could think of a stable and testing releases row to be labelled. King got stable where fingers got testing. Andie is old stable. (Alternatively I find the rat called „buddy“ the most central figure, it is not in the row, the little girl neither. )
C
linked text
a named anchor
What is the current question?
The current
-Question: is how get track of gui cracking, hostile minded gui cracking, if this is a legitimate question to ask, among people: that you do not use the gui not what it is designed for, but you use it for certain reason in a way its design is supposed to be even hostile to and that is your opted way of using it: by „cracking the gui“, transforming the interface by heavy effort an by: user simulation to a cli.
This normally goes with a heavy, heavy, remaining impact of narcisst bombardment in the internet, they yell you like a kid, who is getting disallowed. Well the anonymity cape should be soon in role always. This is not disallowed.
-Question: how is there no life in xautomation as in ahk, where there is community? Thanks.
-Question:who is doinf gui cracking these days? Tester? Gamer? Developer?
# Is this tool reliable? Answer: There are reported to be gamers in permanent usage, no signal of other cases.
-Question: Is there a science for „gui cracking“ as there is one for lock picking? There should by some intelegence effort in user interface design? Must not be fierce fight among multiply agents: „you get an hour at the power source if you service my gui.“ scenario. Are not we in military area, yet?
-Question: So what in gui cracking is not understood or/and not understandable?
Imagining the use case: evil vendor, such as state of Germany, forces a considerable amount of people, using his gui’s as labour. So the idea goes, i mean too, clearly to automiate this senseless because forced work, right?
-Question: Which software would be preferred as ahk substitute in linux? Answer, still more popular: autokey (google’s code donation code, mostly abandoned, but mailing list signal), xautomation: python bindings techniques
-Question: Is there a summary list of all ahk use cases somewhere? Thanks for a pointer. Answer: ahk wiki.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9E4Mstmx64&feature=youtu.be&t=169 got them here talking about „guy cracking“, btw
In chat:
Understand me: If there where ahk-clone community in linux I would wine at theme, but as they none, whom should I next ask: ahk windows, for example why there is critical mass and/or incentive, on linux not, why not?
guicrackingthe best bet is that the mass which is deed critical to this phenomenon, is after what? rapid shooting, ok. But in a general sense is is explicitly this: that user fools his work giver. I am however in search for such fooling functionality, e.g. in terms a a. i. library.guicrackingI see the development of ahk functionality limited
and ask for ways to change that …
there are a lot more uses for AHK than just moving the mouse
I got it: In linux there are more developer, so that says their are professionals, that throws out that they are not only bastards but definitely idiots. So they can not recognize, in windows on the other hand there is kind of the opposite pole, at least some people, who do not celebrate their limitations. Gamers have no problem in tying the fire button to a rapid fire routine, for example. They are elite.
That is what I learned from you.
Fazit: Gamers are survivors.
Board indexAutoHotkeyScripts and FunctionsGaming- Board indexAutoHotkeyAnnouncements

During the webinar, we will announce the winner of the $100 Amazon gift card.
Join us Thursday May 19th at 3 EST / 12 PST
- Audio playback / editing
- DLL calls
- File manipulation / Disk management
- Gaming
- xxGUIs ### What does that mean,1) GUI designing, 2)them automating them 3) some other specific stuff?
- Hotkeys# well, personal interest
- Hotstrings#well, personal interest
- xImage viewing / editing # what is that ocr reading in images??
- Manipulate other programs/objects w/COM (Component Object Model) #well, personal interest, something not linix?–>dead alley, hm?
- Mouse manipulation 1) is that not gui automating? this commercial offer goes inconsistent, is there gui auto without mouse: yes.
- Object oriented #main uses!=programming style?? This could mean: if I used it for object orientated programming. No I use python, and then for object oriented programming I use ahk? They cripple ahk with oo? With whatever possible. Is that the message? Ok. Finding.
- Registry editing #
- Regular expressions # Python?
- Re-mapping of keys # This is some kind of animal from „Hotstring“, „Hotkeys“
- Text Manipulation#ok
- Video playback / editing
- Web Scraping #ok, yes there is a new word for it. I do not believe this techniques robust against evil vendors, waste of time surely. Examples?

But I fear in the end this all_ will need to be backed by „gui automation with or by mouse automation“: that will be the name understood.
- Webpage Manipulation# No thanks we hack no pentagon for now…
- Windows Send & Post Messages # has this with „gui automation with or by mouse automation“ or more specific“evil vendor gui automation with or by mouse automation“ +“Image viewing“ +“Web Scraping“
- Other – Write InPlease enter an ‚other‘ value for this selection.
What do they gain? Nothing? They learn just together?
https://autohotkey.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=17553&p=85475#p85475
here I ended up today. This is what I have brought to them professionals, but I am bringing to the forum, gratuite advice, which is to certain extend, duty of free licensed software. Says I. Keeping everything hidden as support style and mean of run short knowledge. Well seems that they have absolutely no shame in celebrating „a user’s training to their products“ event of it, some kind of Butterfahrt: shopping excursion (by boat) to buy cheap and duty free goods. It is known in Germany and it has something to do with hostages. Terrible, but unique.
Expecting the worst, hoping the best, ok? We will see, which results would still drain through in upcoming time. I am searching for the most audacious gui crackers of there game vendors. Who does such stuff, who publishes it? The most ambitious, should yes think of it, as a matter of fact. I think the heat zone of culture industrial influence is different. On the other hand there shoot be enough students of computer science among them, too. Hell, there must be signal. Why there is no signal. Lets wait, and if nothing: read the code of their projects, if they do robust simulation of human graphical interaction. Maybe I am on a blind alley, and should waste no time on windows Butterfahrt and draw directly to where they cover gui cracking decently: to universities software engineering zoos (there where facultatively questioning human reaction, e.g. for medical purpose etc.? Is there only one scientist group free software working on this in world, I had signal. Do not they all, google and co., have bots around, using artifically guis unknown to them in the outer world and there is no free software among them, not one? hm) and to testers of free software graphical interfaces (these last ones wont look wont watch out evil vendor feature, forget it). The last question could go to the forum, could not it?
But lets wait.
….
….